Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience

Fig. 2

From: Investigating the Correlation–Firing Rate Relationship in Heterogeneous Recurrent Networks

Fig. 2

Susceptibility (Ŝ) vs. firing rate, computed for the asynchronous network studied in [4], with all other parameters besides threshold θ and mean inhibitory conductance \(\langle g_{I}\rangle\) set to their average values (thereby leaving a two-dimensional parameter space: the other (averaged) parameters are \(\langle\sigma_{g_{I},i} \rangle_{p} = 0.6602\) (see Eq. (30)), \(\langle\sigma_{g_{E},i} \rangle_{p} = 0.0026\) (see Eq. (29)), \(\langle\sigma_{i} \rangle_{p} = 6.3246\), \(\langle\langle g_{E},i \rangle \rangle_{p} = 0.0053\) (see Eq. (17)). Here, we traverse the plane on three different families of straight-line paths. The dashed lines show paths visualized in [4]: \(\theta= 1\) (vertical, aqua blue) and \(\langle g_{I}\rangle= 1.83\) (horizontal, orange/yellow)

Back to article page